currupt4130
VT Hokie
With an opinion column:
That was a reply to this, written by another student.
I would like to try and level with the author of the letter to the editor "Concealed Carry Unnecessary" (CT, Feb. 12).
We've all heard all the arguments that are pro-CCW. Yes, we know that CCW holders are responsible, are 5.7 times less likely to commit a crime, and have passed an extensive background check that certifies that they have no felony or drug convictions and no recorded history of mental illness.
And we can dismiss the concern that those who carry concealed are just going to "snap" one day, because as has been previously stated, time has proven otherwise. It just doesn't happen. It has also been said that responsible citizens are not going to endanger their right to carry by brandishing their weapon in an obscene and illegal fashion.
What I would like to contend is that concealed weapons are in a way like smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. How many times in your life have you had to rely on your smoke detector to let you know there was a fire? Not many, if at all, I hope. But for those people that have, I'm sure they were glad it was there because it may have inevitably saved their lives. We all remember the incident in Collegiate Suites where the girls were poisoned because of a carbon monoxide leak.
Had they had carbon monoxide detectors prior to that incident, chances are they wouldn't have been hospitalized. However, they didn't. And what did Collegiate Suites do immediately afterwards? They installed CO detectors.
Not because Collegiate Suites thought that it was going to happen again, but because Collegiate Suites deemed it necessary to the safety of their occupants. Now personally, I don't have a carbon monoxide detector where I live, nor do I have one at my home away from Blacksburg. But some people choose to install them, and possibly more people chose to install them immediately following the incident in Collegiate Suites.
My point is this: guns are not necessary to every single person on campus, just as carbon monoxide detectors are not necessary to every home. Some people may install them when there is very little risk of a carbon monoxide leak, while others install them because there is a very real danger of one. Here on campus some people may not feel that there is a need for guns, while others, such as myself, feel that if I want to carry a concealed weapon on campus, I should be allowed to. What a lot of people seem to forget about concealed weapons is that they are concealed. If I were to illegally walk into a classroom with a properly concealed weapon, no one would ever know unless I told them or showed them.
Granted, I would never do that, but hopefully you understand my point.
Another point I would like to make is that all the anti-gun advocates seem to blow allowing concealed weapons on campus way out of proportion. They seem to think that if it was allowed, that every single student would go out and buy a handgun, and get their CCW permit. In reality, do you think this would ever happen?
There are plenty of anti-gun advocates, plenty of underage students, and plenty who just don't feel the need to carry, who would never go out and get a gun and their CCW permit. Allowing concealed guns on campus would no more heighten anxiety than the number of rough-looking construction workers on campus does. The simple saying, "Out of sight, out of mind" seems to sum up what I'm trying to say about law-abiding CCW holders carrying on campus.
Sam Stephens
junior, mechanical engineering
That was a reply to this, written by another student.
A recent letter to the editor said that "Taking away someone's gun because they might shoot someone is like cutting out their tongue because they might yell 'fire!' in a crowded theater."
This is a fairly apt analogy, but for one thing, a tongue can be used for many other things besides yelling "fire" -- eating, for instance, or reciting poetry or yelling to stop a car from striking a pedestrian.
However, to borrow a phrase from author Gary Paulson, the sole use of a gun is to punch holes in other human beings. There is no need for anybody to secretly carry around campus devices designed expressly to maim and kill. If handguns are allowed on campus, then we may as well allow people to bring in bombs, nerve gas and rabid attack dogs. No matter how "safe" that vial of drug-resistant anthrax makes me feel, it still has no place in the classroom. The same is true for firearms.
Rachel Taylor
sophomore, mathematics